WFD published an analysis looking into the impact of the pandemic on persons with disabilities in North Macedonia, produced by the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights. The analysis was presented to the public in June 2021, in the presence of Minister for Labour and Social Affairs Jagoda Shahpaska and British Deputy Ambassador Dominic Otway. The […]
Albania: National security and the protection of human rights during emergency situations
Last year, many countries were faced with COVID-19 pandemic that provoked serious emergency health and national crises. Managing the pandemic and its consequences has been the most important task of the governments across the globe. Most countries implemented temporary measures of quarantine that limited certain human rights. In particular, the freedom of movement and assembly were directly affected by governments’ responses to the pandemic. The COVID 19 is responsible for the excessive mortality rates of the world’s population and the right to life is directly endangered by this infectious disease.
In the Albanian context, the COVID-19 pandemic is treated as a national (public) security threat, as it poses risks to the security and wellbeing of the population. This pandemic has demonstrated that the scope of what is understood to be included in national security must be expanded to encompass wider security threats such as environmental and global public health crises.
To limit the spread of the virus, the governments are empowered to take extraordinary measures that would temporarily limit human rights. However, democratic governments must be held accountable for any tradeoffs made in terms of civil liberties and human rights that are authorized in the name of national (public) security.
To better understand this dynamic, a research study was carried out in Albania to contextualize and compare country’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic within a framework of national security and human rights perspectives. Furthermore, the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Albania is compared with other countries in the region, including Serbia, and North Macedonia, Slovenia and Greece.
To that aim, the research was guided by four established democratic principles: legality; a bounded timeframe for emergency measures; necessity; and distributed power with legislative and judicial actions and checks on executive actions taken during the first six months of the pandemic.
– Where does Albania stand in complying with the four established democratic principles?
– What is the situation with the other countries?
– Is any difference between the established democracies and hybrid regimes?
– Which country complied with all the democratic principles and which are the main takeaways in managing such a crisis?
To learn more, please read below the research commissioned by WFD Albania.
Women politicians study the effects of indoor air pollution on the health and economy in Bosnia and Herzegovina
During the winter, air pollution in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) reaches unprecedented levels, with country’s capital Sarajevo often being the most polluted capital in the world. Indoor air pollution is particularly dangerous for citizens of BiH, although it is an issue that remains relatively unknown as outdoor air pollution takes over when the entire country […]
The general principle of equality and non-discrimination is a fundamental element of international human rights law. Creating an enabling environment in which decision-makers and civil society actors can advance equality is important in promoting inclusion in society. Unfortunately, this remains a challenge in many parts of the world. In Uganda, women, girls, and members of the LGBT+ community are […]